The Official Website Of Triumph

Welcome to TriumphMusic.com Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Triumph adds a second guitarist

Last post Fri, Jun 20 2008, 8:48 AM by trentc. 43 replies.
Page 3 of 3 (44 items)   < Previous 1 2 3
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  Mon, May 19 2008, 9:27 PM 16187 in reply to 16179

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    I really don't care if their is another guitarist on stage...  Its been such a long wait that I am not going to be picky about a second guitarist.  I just can't wait until the 2009 tour (if it happens) to watch, listen, and pretend I am 18 again....  Cool
  •  Tue, May 20 2008, 10:05 AM 16197 in reply to 16187

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    I've been off the board for a little while.  I see some things haven't changed.  Snarky - I like that.

    Just a quick sidenote on Dave Dunlop playing with Triumph.  During the beginning stages of rehersals for the Sweden show, Rik, Gil and Dave were working on the arrangements of some of the songs they are going to perform.  Apparently, as Rik and Gil were taking the lead on the arrangments, Dave pointed out to them that they were not correct.  Dave had learned to play Triumph songs by listening to the original arrangements, the way they were recorded.  Rik and Gil fell into step with how the songs had been performed live in the past, without ever revisting the recordings.  This, apparently, prompted Rik to make the comment that they had been playing their own songs wrong for the many years they had been touring.  So, from that standpoint, Dave had already had a positive impact on the reunion. 

    That bit of info was provided via Rik's message board.  Although, most of the rehersal scuttlebutt is being kept quite hush-hush. 

  •  Tue, May 20 2008, 11:56 AM 16198 in reply to 16197

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Wow that's really interesting stuff. Makes me glad to be a part of this board as I would have never have known this otherwise. Thanks for the info Raider.
  •  Tue, May 20 2008, 12:33 PM 16199 in reply to 16198

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    ha thats cool to find out and I bet that its that same with with almost every band though.  They'll alter songs when they play them live and over the years they change a little bit compared to the original recording.
    Can't you feel the magic, feel it everywhere, Can't you hear the music, there's something in the air, There's a celebration, deep within a song, Celebrate this feeling, you know it can't be wrong
  •  Wed, May 21 2008, 8:40 AM 16223 in reply to 16199

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    I wonder what songs they were talkiing about. This is nothing new to my hears.

    Listening to them live was never like listening to the album. There are many songs they played that wasn't exactly like the album version. I just figured they did this on purpose. 

  •  Fri, May 30 2008, 11:59 PM 16584 in reply to 16223

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    T overdubbed pretty liberally on a lot of their studio albums. (guitars, keyboards and vocals) Certain songs needed a different arrangement to be workable live and some, apparently, were considered not workable at all.

    As far as back up musicians under the stage etc... T never did that. I've listened to a lot of Triumph boots from the early days. And it's -always- clearly one guitar, bass, drums, two voices and keyboards -only- when Mike is not playing bass.

    Side musicians started with Santers and of course they were very open about his playing with them.

    I would have preferred the trio, I'm partial to trios and I'm one of those who thought the live sound was better without Santers. But who's complaining? They toured as a four piece the last -three- tours (counting EoE) so this is hardly a shock, especially since Gil and Mike are probably still a bit rusty.

    I'll feel a lot better about it if they use Dunlop as an excuse to pull out some stuff (Hold On, Just A Game... maybe? Nah... I wish, though!!) that would be tough to do as a trio. I would guess we'll get a pretty typical greatest hits package. Since they've been away so long, though, I'd wish they'd use that as a justification to say "screw it" and do a more eclectic set list. (One can always dream, eh?)

    One good thing about Dunlop, I don't believe he plays keyboards like Santers, which I felt there was a little too much of on the last tours. Triumph doesn't need them, beyond the bits that Mike does. He should make the harmonies better, which is a plus. Gil and Rik have such different voices, one weakness of T live is that the harmonies were always weak (or non-existent) compared to the studio versions.

    My guess is that overall, this will be a great show, in any case.


    Don't look back in anger, don't look ahead in fear. You just keep takin' her as she comes, until she comes in clear. The love you send out, returns to you in time.
  •  Sat, May 31 2008, 12:09 AM 16585 in reply to 16584

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    I read just today that Dave will be playing guitar only, there wont be any keyboard oriented tunes.
    Gearpedia.net Woodworkingforum.net
  •  Sat, May 31 2008, 8:19 AM 16586 in reply to 16585

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Mike would probably play the keyboard intros.

    Like the old days.
     

     

    Hank 


    Triumph Userbar
  •  Mon, Jun 02 2008, 6:02 PM 16630 in reply to 16585

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Drew:
    I read just today that Dave will be playing guitar only, there wont be any keyboard oriented tunes.

    I think Santers did the Keyboards to Somebody's Out There...so I think that one might be out now, or they'll play it w/o keys? who knows


    Can't you feel the magic, feel it everywhere, Can't you hear the music, there's something in the air, There's a celebration, deep within a song, Celebrate this feeling, you know it can't be wrong
  •  Tue, Jun 17 2008, 5:48 AM 17272 in reply to 16630

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    This is not necessary. Especially now. The three of them have enough to do to make sure they all get along and stay together. Having a 4th member will only hinder and complicate communication.

     Triumph is a trio!

  •  Tue, Jun 17 2008, 9:32 AM 17283 in reply to 17272

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    You know what...Triumph as a TRIO decided years ago that their music is better live with a bit of assistance (Santers)  and I appreciate the fact that they want the songs to sound the best they possibly can by adding a guitarist that is capable and qualified to do so live.  This shows that they care of what they sound like.  Unlike some bands today, that leave out vocals, guitars etc.. when they play live as it is just to "complicated" to put them in - Motley Crue is a good example- Vince skips lyrics all the time, (in almost every song or just mumbles them) which is a terrible thing to do. Triumph just wants the fans to be happy with what they hear.  When they are in the studio recording, they do overlays, layers etc... that just can not be done by 3 band members live, so to get the best sound possible, they get a bit of "help" with an extra guitarist.  I was 13 when I first seen Triumph live (Halifax concert DVD release) and I seen Santers on stage with them...I understood right away why he was there, even at age 13....you just have to understand music and respect that Triumph has learned over the years that it sounds better live with some assistance.  Now just because in the past, you may have not seen a 4th member on stage with Triumph (pre- Santers days) certainly does not mean there was not someone slightly behind the scenes keeping rythm while Rik did solos etc...you would be surprised at some of the "tricks" bands do to get the sound right when playing live.  All part of the music industry.  Sometimes things that are done by bands are kind of cheats and cop-outs, but not in Triumphs case, it is about making it a better experience for the fans..bottom line..and I respect them for thinking of us.
  •  Tue, Jun 17 2008, 6:19 PM 17296 in reply to 17283

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Maybe Rik brought him along as backup....Wink
  •  Thu, Jun 19 2008, 11:40 AM 17387 in reply to 17296

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    I listen very critically to bands and their instrumentation. On every pre-Santers show I've ever heard, there was never once rhythm guitar under any of the solos... it was always just bass and drums. If there was a second guitarist, he was aping Rik so closely and subtly it sounded like one guitar. That would be kind of a funny job, eh? :)

    The vocals? No. If anything, T's vocals did suffer live and it was noticeable on certain songs. Keyboards? You only rarely hear them when Mike is not playing bass. And when you do, it's some very basic chord pad that Mike could easily have set before he went back to hacking at his bass.

    Triumph was and probably still is completely capable of pulling off a great show just with the three of them. Given that the guys are not as agile as in their youth, a fourth guy now helps to fill the stage a bit, amongst other things.

    I think Dave fits in better than Santers, who was a -little- too much like a glam rocker for my tastes ('course, it was during T' glam period...) and was also a little too liberal with the keys. (though he was just playing what was there on the records, for the most part)


    Don't look back in anger, don't look ahead in fear. You just keep takin' her as she comes, until she comes in clear. The love you send out, returns to you in time.
  •  Fri, Jun 20 2008, 8:48 AM 17405 in reply to 17387

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    I agree with you BassPlayinBri.  For sure they have some kinks to work out..no big deal, it has been a long time.  And as far as having someone behind the scenes playing rythm, I don't think Triumph ever did this in the past at all, but realized as time went on (Live in Halifax DVD with Santers) that it would probably sound better with the extra player, so they did so openly.  As for Santers looking GLAM..did you see those multi-colored tights Rik had on in that concert, and the fluffy white top..he he..funny stuff to see now, but was perfect for it's time...Just like you stated, it was just the era...funny stuff.

    I did notice Santers signing some backup stuff during that show, although I'm not sure they needed it, as they are powerful enough to get the sound with just the 3 of them vocally.

    All in all..TRIUMPH IS BACK.  And that is all I care about.  We are lucky enough to have all 3 of them, as some bands re-unite and only have partial original members in the line-up.  Imagine if Rik and Mike got back together with a different drummer other than Gil...we are lucky! 

    Now, they just have to come back to Halifax. 

Page 3 of 3 (44 items)   < Previous 1 2 3
View as RSS news feed in XML