The Official Website Of Triumph

Welcome to TriumphMusic.com Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Triumph adds a second guitarist

Last post Fri, Jun 20 2008, 8:48 AM by trentc. 43 replies.
Page 1 of 3 (44 items)   1 2 3 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  Tue, May 13 2008, 8:51 AM 16019

    Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Reunited Canadian rockers Triumph have added Dave Dunlop from frontman Rik Emmett's Strung-Out Troubadours project to play second guitar for Triumph's forthcoming shows, including next month's Sweden Rock Festival.

    Rik Emmett (vocals, guitars), Mike Levine (bass, keyboards) and Gil Moore (vocals, drums) were destined for stardom when they formed the Canadian hard-rock trio Triumph in 1975. Their debut self-titled album was released in 1976 by Attic Records and quickly reached gold status. On the strength of the group's non-stop touring schedule throughout Canada and the USA, Triumph had rapidly built a large and loyal fan base.

    Triumph is scheduled to perform at Sweden Rock 2008 in Sölvesborg, Sweden on Saturday, June 7th and on Friday July 11th at Rocklahoma.

  •  Tue, May 13 2008, 2:00 PM 16023 in reply to 16019

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    kinda figured that would happen

    I wonder how Dave gets along with the guys, he probably has no idea whats going on with some of the stories they tell, but the same can be said with Rik and Dave since they've been playing together for a long time as well.


    Can't you feel the magic, feel it everywhere, Can't you hear the music, there's something in the air, There's a celebration, deep within a song, Celebrate this feeling, you know it can't be wrong
  •  Tue, May 13 2008, 5:38 PM 16027 in reply to 16023

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    I kind of have mixed emotions about a second guitarist. On the one hand it does make the live performance much more rich and closer to studio versions. I saw them during the "SoK" tour and was amazed at the difference a rhythm guitarist makes in addition to Rik's lead in a live show but sentimentally speaking Triumph is comprised of THREE musicians and I think I'd rather see the original lineup at least during a long overdue reunion. Maybe adding another guitarist on down the line would be better but that's just my 2 cents.
  •  Tue, May 13 2008, 6:15 PM 16030 in reply to 16027

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Paul, I agree with you completely.  Triumph is Rik, Gil, and Mike, and as far as i'm concerned, nobody else should be on stage with them.  Especially considering its the reunion that no one ever thought would happen.  I can't stand to watch the Eagles anymore because they have gotten ridiculous with the extra musicians.  They have a second drummer, another guitar player, a keyboard player, a bongo player, backup singers.  While Triumph obviously would never get that bad, less is more in my book.
  •  Tue, May 13 2008, 8:45 PM 16035 in reply to 16030

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    was kinda hopeing it would just be the three of them but oh well.maybe they'll do some stuff  live like headed for nowhere hold on (the non accoustic version) and some other stuff they would need a second guitarist for.any wayLET'S FIRE UP THE ROCK'N'ROLL MACHINE.Beer


    GO VIKES
  •  Tue, May 13 2008, 11:03 PM 16039 in reply to 16035

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    SPHERRERA:

    some other stuff they would need a second guitarist for

    I think you hit the nail on the head


    Gearpedia.net Woodworkingforum.net
  •  Wed, May 14 2008, 12:11 AM 16041 in reply to 16039

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Any person who believes that a band does not include other musicians on their tours are brainless. Every band always has those 'silent silent partners' playing in the back.
  •  Wed, May 14 2008, 8:42 AM 16050 in reply to 16041

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Luvers666:
    Any person who believes that a band does not include other musicians on their tours are brainless. Every band always has those 'silent silent partners' playing in the back.

     

    The "brainless" comment was uncalled for, in my opinion.  You could have found a more tactful way to state that other musicians are used, without resorting to that.  Those types of comments are childish and don't have a place among constructive discussion.

  •  Wed, May 14 2008, 9:28 AM 16051 in reply to 16050

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    madmax:

    Luvers666:
    Any person who believes that a band does not include other musicians on their tours are brainless. Every band always has those 'silent silent partners' playing in the back.

     

    The "brainless" comment was uncalled for, in my opinion.  You could have found a more tactful way to state that other musicians are used, without resorting to that.  Those types of comments are childish and don't have a place among constructive discussion.

    "Ditto" Let him stand behind the amps and play.Triumph is Rik,Gil & Mike....It did not work with Chandler Bing (santers) on stage. The only dunlop that should be on this Triumph tour are the tires on the bus......
  •  Wed, May 14 2008, 11:40 AM 16053 in reply to 16051

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

     Luvers666:
    Any person who believes that a band does not include other musicians on their tours are brainless. Every band always has those 'silent silent partners' playing in the back.
     
    Luvers, when Triumph first came on the scene with their infamous live shows were there "silent silent partners" playing in the back? If so, please name them.
     
    -signed "brainless" 
  •  Wed, May 14 2008, 2:40 PM 16057 in reply to 16053

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Well, my two cents on this is that those of you who don't think Dave should be playing at all or be "seen" on stage, you're missing out. He's a phenomenal guitarist, an excellent backup vocalist and has a great stage presence...his chemistry with Rik is outstanding, both musically and visually.

    I'm sure Gil and Mike very quickly realized what a valuable asset Dave is when they began rehearsing last month. If they didn't think having Dave along was a major enhancement to the show, they obviously wouldn't do it. I think I have a little more faith in their opinions than mine or yours. Plus, the Triumph songs just sound better and fuller with a second guitar, not to mention the added backup vocals. Not like Rik only plays one guitar part on the studio albums...lotta layers to those tunes.

    Yeah, I loved the raw power of the original trio, but I've seen Rik wtih Dave about 6 times and it absolutely rocks, and I also really dug the SOK tour with Santers on board. So I'm looking forward to it, and I think if you're lucky enough to catch one of the Triumph shows with Dave Dunlop, you'll change your thinking.

     

  •  Wed, May 14 2008, 3:01 PM 16058 in reply to 16057

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Personally, I want the best show possible. If the boys think adding Dave to the mix will give that. I have no problem whatsoever.  Santers didn't bother me back in 86. Dave Dunlop won't bother me now.

    "Debate the place of chivalry in a post-sexual revolution world all you like - holding the door's the only way to check out her ass." - Philalawyer
  •  Wed, May 14 2008, 7:27 PM 16063 in reply to 16053

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Luvers, when Triumph first came on the scene with their infamous live shows were there "silent silent partners" playing in the back? If so, please name them.
    -signed "brainless" 

    I agree..in the old days it was just the 3 of them. I saw them way back ..there were no silent partners and they did'nt need them.  I'm sure alot of bands do have extra musicians helping them out at concerts but I don't beleive that every band out there does. I think you are exaggerating abit and are somewhat insulting to the bands out there. And I agree that the 'brainless' comment was not called for and was childish. Out of all the people on here that post comments I'm surprised that these type of comments would come from Luvers666. I would've thought she was better than that. 

    I can understand previous comments about just wanting it to be the three of them. That's what they were in the old days. That would make it a true reunion. But at the same time I can understand them wanting Dave in there. It would definitely inhance the show. I have no problem with him being there with them. He is a great musician and would be a real asset to them. I wonder if they even considered Santers or where he is now. Personally, I think Dave is the better choice.  In the end, it really doesn't matter to me whether it's just the 3 of them or they have back up...it'll be just great to have them together and playing again. It's still great to see Triumph back even if it's only for a couple of concerts. I just hope they have a dvd on the concert for those of us that can't afford to go.  

  •  Thu, May 15 2008, 12:07 AM 16065 in reply to 16063

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Im trying to keep an open mind about the second guitarist. In my little mind I think I prefer an actual additional musican then to have them sync'd with a digital track. I'll take live over memorex, but thats just me.

     

    No matter how you look at it, we are in a better place then we were a year ago. Its great to actually have this stuff to debate about.


    Gearpedia.net Woodworkingforum.net
  •  Thu, May 15 2008, 2:44 AM 16066 in reply to 16053

    Re: Triumph adds a second guitarist

    Paul:
     Luvers666:
    Any person who believes that a band does not include other musicians on their tours are brainless. Every band always has those 'silent silent partners' playing in the back.
    Luvers, when Triumph first came on the scene with their infamous live shows were there "silent silent partners" playing in the back? If so, please name them.
    -signed "brainless" 

     

    I too am brainless and saw no need for that comment either, very condescending


    Can't you feel the magic, feel it everywhere, Can't you hear the music, there's something in the air, There's a celebration, deep within a song, Celebrate this feeling, you know it can't be wrong
Page 1 of 3 (44 items)   1 2 3 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML